Hi,
finally here it comes, here it goes, post about Higgs boson is coming. Lets look what the “god’s particle” is how physicists found it and what it means.
God’s particle
Lets see how Higgs boson was named the god’s particle.
One of the best particle physicists Leon Lederman who found out that there are more types of neutrinos and so on and on. He wrote a book named the “God’s particle”. The book was partially named like this because the publisher did not want it to be named “Damned particle”.
He did this and now all physicists can agree on one thing, they hate this phrase because Higgs boson has nothing to do with God.
While all journalists can agree that “God’s particle” is amazing phrase.
So if you want some physicist to be angry on you, just mention the God particle and he will never forget.
Higgs boson was found 4.7.2012 in Large Hadron Collider.
Higgs field
What is actually more important than Higgs boson, the particle, is the field from which it came, this is the Higgs field. I already talked in last post about fields and how specific vibrations can form particles. Higgs field can do this too and it makes the higgs boson which decay almost immediately and is really hard to detect.
Higgs field is a very different from other fields because other fields can get to 0 energy while Higgs field can not. What is more accurate to say is that non zero value of Higgs field is less energetic than zero so Higgs field does not want to fall on the value of 0.
What does it do?
Well you may have heard about Higgs field giving mass to matter. This is partially true since when particle interacts with Higgs field they are kind of slowed so they do not travel at the speed of light. Some particles interact more than others like some people interact with group of people more than others because they are well known [1].
At one post I wrote about symmetries, check it out if you did not already. There is symmetry in particles. They are all the same.
What? Now this symmetry is broken, this means that there are differences between particles, thanks Higgs field! This is the most important effect of the field with the effect that while it would not change much the mass of protons and neutrons, it would change the mass of electron rapidly if it would not exist. Now the space occupied by particles as electrons is set and such a light particles need to have a lot of space around them. If you would turn off Higgs field completely, things would probably gone exploding a lot since the size of atom would increase as the space around electron needed would get bigger.
Dragallur
[1] This does not mean that all the mass is from Higgs field, most mass of neutron and proton is made up of energy m=E/c^2.
Outstanding post because it really is understandable!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Glad you liked it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
W against T, reference required. #conspiracyofscience
LikeLike
Sorry? What does “W against T” means?
LikeLike
Traditional physics predicts weight
should NOT change at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum. Results required.
LikeLike
Why should it change, the atoms are only moving faster..
LikeLike
My theory predicts W reduction at increasing T in vacuum and can be found here http://peswiki.com/index.php/Review:Magnetic_Universe_Theory_Of_Science
LikeLike
I guess that you can test this by yourself, if you were right it would pay off and you seem to believe in it a lot.. also I think that you should study more traditional physics and understand it on proffesional level and then you will be able to answer all your questions.
LikeLike
I am not an experimentalist. I think this experiment should be carried out by proper experimentalists to test conservation of mass.
LikeLike
I guess that nobody will do this experiment for you because first of all, there is not a single equation it actually seems as some kind of joke with few pictures also, lot of things are based on conservation of mass, people wont just throw over head everything because of such hypothesis.
LikeLike
This experiment should be carried out for science and society, not for me. I think the reason results are not published is scientists place selfish interests above physical truth.
LikeLike
All scientists?
LikeLike
All scientists I contacted, physicists, chemists, biologists, mathematicians, philosophers and others.
LikeLike
What did they say?
LikeLike
Some said W does NOT change at increasing T in vacuum without a reference to support their claim. Others said they are not interested to do the experiment because they don’t like my theory.
LikeLike
But physics works, doesn’t it? I mean with what we know we were able to get on Moon and do many other amazing things. Dont you think that somebody would notice in thousands of experiments that there is something wrong?
LikeLike
The mathematical equations used to get to the moon are sufficient for space navigation but errors are magnified over longer distances. I also think scientists noticed this anomaly before but in absence of an alternative theory wiped it under the carpet.
LikeLike
What about LHC?
LikeLike
Likewise, tiny errors are amplified to create endless particles.
LikeLike
I think you should do the actuall physics of it.. what were you proposing? That when you heat something in vacuum it loses weight, which means mass since acceleration does not change, through what does this mass disappear?
LikeLike
I think loss of mass is best explained with diagrams in my theory.
LikeLike
But where does it go in your hypothesis?
LikeLike
It goes nowhere, cool it down at it will come back.
LikeLike
Since I am no experimentalist I wont do the experiment for you.. I do not think that your hypothesis is right simply because there are thousands of experiments already done and tens of thousands of scientists working with the current theory, and though yes there are mistakes it is most probably not the conservation of mass. Maybe you should write for some journal so someone takes you seriously.
LikeLike
Most probably not conservation of mass ? I want definitive answers with precision measurements. Please further our discussion forward.
LikeLike
Try to talk to some physicist in person. You know there are thousands of people proposing strange things on internet, you wont get your experiment like this.
LikeLike
I contacted thousands of scientists to do the experiment and didn’t get the results. Physicists were too arrogant to speak to a no one like me.
LikeLike
Thousands of scientists? Aren’t you exagerrating? Well there is probably reason why they would not want to speak with you, try to take talk to them as you do not understand it at all but that you came up with this, if it would work, I think that if you are so persistent now, you will find someone who will speak to you. If not well, there must be problem on your side.
LikeLike
Is a problem on my side an excuse not to do the most important experiment in history of physics ?
LikeLike
If it is the most important experiment than sure no. But what I meant was that if you want this experiment be performed or you want to discuss it with people that are good at physics, there is nothing hilding you back, it will probably take you week before you find someone who will talk about it with you and explain if you are right or wrong.
LikeLike
The University of Leeds will not assist my project – Dean of Mathematics & Physical Sciences.
LikeLike
Try to discuss it with individuals first of all, if it shows that you are wrong do not cling to it.
LikeLike
I contacted most physicists at the University of Leeds. One offered to do the experiment for £120,000. I only had £20,000.
LikeLike
Well it is up to you.
LikeLike
One my wage it will take 20 years to save this amount of money. Don’t you think our discussion is sinking rapidly ? What is £120,000 out of billions spent on physical research to do this most important of experiments.
LikeLike
So you think that you must be right?
LikeLike
I think if I was wrong someone would have already sent me the results.
LikeLike
Or they just think that it is not worth their time.
LikeLike
Or they want to protect their research funding. Or they don’t want to be proven wrong. Who knows ? results required.
LikeLike
Sure but it is either thousands of people wrong or you.
LikeLike
Exactly. Let the results decide.
LikeLike